Customer Service  Articles & Resources

 

 

Latest Articles from Swifteq's Blog

From 2% to 100%: a Practical Guide to Auto QA in Zendesk

From 2% to 100%: a Practical Guide to Auto QA in Zendesk

Most Zendesk quality assurance (QA) programs run the same way: a team lead pulls a handful of closed tickets each week and scores them against a scorecard, usually somewhere between 2% and 5% of total ticket volume. The other 95%-plus closes without anyone looking at...

Writing Knowledge Base Articles for Humans and AI

Writing Knowledge Base Articles for Humans and AI

Your help center used to be just documentation and a place for customers and support agents to find answers. Now, it's the thing your support bot reads to answer customers, and it never stopped being documentation.  This means every article now has two readers at...

When Your QA Score Says “Bad Agent”, and It’s Wrong

When Your QA Score Says “Bad Agent”, and It’s Wrong

A dog barks once in the background of an otherwise perfect call. The agent scores zero. A phone transfer drops the first two seconds of a handoff. The receiving agent is dinged for an incomplete greeting. A customer's real name happens to sound like a profanity. An...

How AI Is Changing Support Engineering Roles

How AI Is Changing Support Engineering Roles

Many of us keep hearing that AI is coming for our jobs. Support engineers are no exception. But the reality on the ground can look quite different. Some teams are using AI every day to streamline workflows, automate repetitive tasks, and surface insights faster....

If Not Empathy, Why Empathy Shaped?

If Not Empathy, Why Empathy Shaped?

Nearly every QA rubric in Customer Support has a criterion version of it: “agent demonstrated empathy”. Sometimes it gets a point scale. Sometimes a checkbox. Occasionally a grading guide that says something like "score 3 if the agent showed genuine care for the...

What Should Customer Service QA Actually Measure?

What Should Customer Service QA Actually Measure?

One QA team described reading 8,000 to 9,000 tickets per month by hand, and then moving to AI that runs quality assurance on 100% of tickets, freeing those ten reviewers to do other work entirely. A huge improvement in coverage. That also quietly raises the stakes on...

Hiring for the Queue AI Is Building for You

Hiring for the Queue AI Is Building for You

There's a version of the AI-in-Support conversation that goes like this: AI handles the simple stuff, humans handle the complex stuff, everyone wins. It's a reasonable starting point. It's also incomplete enough to produce some genuinely bad hiring decisions. The...

Subscribe icon